Topics Map > Academic Staff Executive Committee (ASEC) > 2020-2021 > 06. December
Academic Staff Executive Committee Minutes 12-03-20
Approved 12-10-20
ASEC Minutes
2:30 – 4:30 p.m.
Thursday, December 3, 2020
https://uwmadison.zoom.us/j/95254586888
Members
Present: Donna Cole; Jenny
Dahlberg, chair; Tim Dalby; Stephanie Elkins; Mallory Musolf;
Leslie Petty; Deb Shapiro; Lindsey Stoddard Cameron; Bill Tishler
Guests:
Elizabeth Covington, Lesley Fisher, Danielle
Hairston-Green, Karl Scholz, John Zumbrunnen
The meeting was called to order at 2:30 p.m.
The minutes of November 19 were approved with
one correction.
Guest:
Karl Scholz, Provost
Provost Scholz reported that the timetable for
spring courses is now in place. Students can begin to register as early as this
week, though some may choose to wait until after final exams. There is also a
great deal of variation across schools/colleges/divisions in instructional
modalities for the spring semester. With respect to budget cuts, next week all
administrative units and schools/colleges/divisions will be reporting on plans
to meet the one-time budget reduction. Schools/colleges/divisions are getting
somewhat larger one-time cuts, while administrative units will be getting
higher ongoing base cuts. Base budget cuts are happening as part of the normal
budget process, which will happen after the first of the year. These budget
discussions will focus less on 5-year forecasts and more on strategies to
negotiate base budget cuts. This process will unfold in February and March.
Provost Scholz will encourage the deans to have conversations with CASIs as a way to involve shared governance in the decision-making
around these issues. ASEC also suggested possible town halls within
schools/colleges/divisions as an addition to any written communication.
Regarding summer session, there will likely still be a mixture of instructional
modalities, with the majority likely still being remote.
General Reports
Jenny Dahlberg, ASEC chair, reported on her
efforts to encourage staff involvement in the decision-making around the base
budget cuts, which the Provost addressed in his visit. Jenny also reported on
the first academic staff chat, which was on the topic of work-life balance for
those with care responsibilities. The chat was well attended
and participants were very engaged. One takeaway was the potential stigmas
around elder care not receiving the same understanding and priority that
childcare does. This issue will be pursued further with OHR and the Vice
Provost for Faculty and Staff Affairs.
Jake Smith, Secretary of the Academic Staff, received
a request from the Sustainability Office to provide reports on the progress of
the Sustainability Advisory Committee. ASEC wanted to hear updates from the
committee before scheduling them for future Assembly meetings. Jake reported
that the Policy Library Project is nearing completion. Policies are being
loaded into the library, and policies that came out of academic staff
governance, including ASPP, will be included. Jake will invite those heading up
the project to a future ASEC meeting to talk more about the next steps for the
library. The Fall CASI Session is scheduled for December 18.
Liaison Reports
Deb Shapiro reported that the Librarians
Assembly heard from Vice Provost for Libraries Lisa Carter about the libraries’
strategic plan and responses to COVID. At its recent meeting, the L&S CASI
discussed budget cuts, resources for online teaching, and ways to promote more
peer-to-peer interaction among students. There was also discussion of the
progress on the L&S building project.
Leslie Petty reported on the previous day’s
meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee on Academic and University Staff Diversity,
Equity, and Inclusion. The initial meetings of this committee have been spent
navigating the broad charge given to the committee. Members are breaking into
smaller subgroups to start looking at data, and the full committee will be
meeting with Interim Chief Diversity Officer Cheryl Gittens on December 15.
Bill Tishler
reported that the University Committee heard reports from the Campus Diversity
and Climate Committee and the Budget Committee, which will be presented to the Faculty
Senate. There were also discussions of tenure extensions due to COVID and the
possibility of some functions of the Faculty Commission on Compensation and
Economic Benefits to the campus-wide Budget Committee.
Tim Dalby reported on Tuesday’s ASM meeting.
The resolution on telecommuting was tabled until the next meeting. There were
also discussions of divestment from fossil fuels, banning surveillance, and
decriminalizing cannabis. There was also commendation for students who served
as election officials in the recent election, and a recommendation was made
that students performing such service be given time off from classes to do so.
Lindsey Stoddard Cameron reported on the
recent meeting of the Campus Planning Committee. The committee met with the
Wisconsin Black Student Union to discuss the proposal to move Chamberlin Rock.
There are several options under consideration, and there was discussion about
the rock’s value as a teaching tool and as a geologic specimen. Faculty in the
Department of Geosciences were also consulted, and there has also been
consultation with the Ho-Chunk Nation due to the rock’s proximity to the effigy
mounds nearby.
Business
·
December Assembly Agenda
Motion
to approve the December Assembly agenda (Dalby). Seconded. Approved.
·
Topics for Guests
VPFS:
revised 6/9/12-month goals, updates on Campus Committee for Diversity Education
and Training
OHR: ALRA, international students, single
payroll, vaccinations and potential requirements
around them
Guest:
John Zumbrunnen, Vice Provost for Teaching and Learning
Vice Provost Zumbrunnen reported on the recent
survey of undergraduate students about their education experience this year.
The Provost shared an overview of the survey at the last ASEC meeting, and Vice
Provost Zumbrunnen focused on a series of questions that applied to a course
that is going well for students and a course that is not. The survey then posed
a series of questions about what is happening in those courses on topics including
course organization, expectations, regular communication with instructors,
assignments that support learning, peer interaction, and whether students felt
supported in the technology used in their courses. The survey affirms that
there are a number of things going well that are core
to success for students, but the peer-to-peer interactions rate lower on a
5-point scale even for courses that are going well. These quantitative data
also track with what the Vice Provost is hearing anecdotally from students. Students
also miss richer opportunities for engagement with instructors, and campus has
work to do in both of these areas. In pursuing
solutions to these issues, we need to be aware of the needs of both students
and instructors to balance the time and effort needed with this level of
engagement along with the well being of all
concerned. Vice Provost Zumbrunnen, along with Vice Provost Steve Cramer and
the Instructional Continuity team, are working on messaging to instructors
about this, as well as working on professional development resources on
interaction in the classroom. There was also a small grant program rolled out
to incentivize instructors or departments to facilitate improvements in this
area. The call went out earlier in the week and there are already more than 30
proposals submitted. Related to these topics are the challenges around
synchronous learning. Students are split on their preferences between
synchronous and asynchronous courses. The course schedule has been built so
that students will be able to search whether a course is synchronous or not,
which can help them choose the delivery modes that they prefer. There will also
be messaging to instructors about the need for direct interaction even in
asynchronous courses, along with the need to be conscientious of students in
other time zones when teaching synchronous courses.
On the topic of pronoun usage, the decision
has been made to turn on this capability in Canvas starting in the spring. The
target date is mid-January. Additional technical options will be explored
during the spring semester, and a communications plan is in the works for
January. Vice Provost Zumbrunnen is also working with the Registrar’s Office
and Student Affairs on a set of guidelines around these, and he will be coming
back to this group and others for feedback.
With regard to Honorlock, they are getting messages out to instructors and
students before finals week that will include checklists for students,
technical support resources, and other things that need to be done to position
students for success. Vice Provost Zumbrunnen and Mo Bischof met with ASM, Gabe
Javier, and Christina Olstad to hear concerns on the
use of Honorlock and discussed how to address these
concerns. Use of Honorlock also poses a larger
question about the extent to which approaches and technologies that have been
used during the pandemic will continue to be used once a vaccine is widely
available.
Meeting adjourned at 4:39 p.m.
Minutes
submitted by Jake Smith, Secretary of the Academic Staff