Collaborative Research

More than ever before, research in the today's university is a collaborative enterprise. High-energy physicists publish papers with hundreds of authors. Many scientists work in laboratory groups, which may include faculty members, staff researchers, post-doctoral fellows, graduate students, and undergraduates. Collaborations between research groups are growing, and the collaborating groups can be across the hall, the country, or the globe. Scholars or groups in different fields work together on interdisciplinary projects.

A number of the areas of responsible conduct of research explicitly concern project collaborations or, more generally, the interactions within scientific communities. Mentorship, authorship allocation, peer review, and plagiarism all stem from interactions between scholars, and are treated in separate modules. Resource sharing, rights to research products after collaborations, and interdisciplinary collaborations are discussed below.

Resource Sharing

Robert Merton, a well know sociologist of science, described four norms of science in 1942. One of these, communism, was that scientists share the results of their research so that science as a whole can advance. While many scientists recognize the sharing of results and material as an ideal, several trends in university research create obstacles for this:

While the National Institutes of Health grant policies require sharing "biomedical research resources," scholars report a wide variety of distribution policies among their peers and, at times, difficulties obtaining desired information or materials.

When Collaborations End...

For a variety of reasons, collaborations end. Ethical issues in these situations include:

Interdisciplinary Collaborations

Because best research practices can vary from field to field, interdisciplinary collaborations can present unique challenges. Practices concerning disclosure of financial interests in journal articles illustrate differences. In medical fields, journals have been moving towards requiring authors to disclose financial interests relating to their research publications. For example, a physician who co-authored a paper on a class of drugs and consulted for a company that made one of the drugs would disclose his or her consulting in the paper. In engineering, however, a scholar who published a paper related to private consulting activities might be discouraged from disclosing a private consulting business because the disclosure could appear promotional. A collaboration between doctors and engineers, in biomedical engineering, for example, would need to determine whether all members would make similar disclosures, whether disclosures would vary depending on the place of publication, etc. Similar need to negotiate best practice can occur in many areas of research conduct.