Topics Map > Lumen Courses > Form Help
Course Proposal Help: Rationale for the Course
- Why is this course being proposed?
- What is the estimated enrollment for the course?
- How many qualified instructors in the primary unit will be able to teach the course?
- Address the relationship of the course to other UW-Madison courses, including the duplication of content, both inside and outside the primary unit.
- What subjects (if any) might be interested in this course?
This section of the form is used to provide information about the purpose of the course and the role it will play in the curriculum. None of the information entered here is part of the catalog entry for the course. Each of the questions is intended to help proposal reviewers understand how the course will be used and why it is needed.
Why is this course being proposed?
In responding to this question, be sure to answer the following:
- What gap in the curriculum is this course fulfilling?
- What is the purpose of the course?
- What degree and/or major requirement(s) will this fulfill?
Provide the rationale on why the course and/or changes are needed. Is this a developing space and/or is the curriculum being revised? A robust rationale helps courses progress through governance review, considering the university has over 9,000 courses already on the books. Include how it fits within the curriculum; whether it's a requirement or optional.
FYI
Indicating a specific degree/major etc. will not automatically add it to the requirements. A separate program proposal must be submitted for this to be considered part of the documented curriculum.
What is the estimated enrollment for the course?
Provide a realistic number of enrollment expected in a given term. Understanding the intended size of the course it helpful in understanding how the course will be taught, the role it will play in the curriculum, and overall demand for the subject matter.
How many qualified instructors in the primary unit will be able to teach the course?
Provide a realistic number of instructors that can teach the course. If the course is niche, provide some information in the rationale on how the course can be sustained. If there is an insufficient number of regular faculty and instructional academic staff who are qualified to teach this course, it is unlikely that the course will be taught regularly. If there are less than three instructors, provide some additional information on how this will be regularly taught within the existing course array.
Related policy: Minimum Qualifications for Instructional Staff
Minimum Qualifications for Instructional Staff
Policy Number
UW-1010Responsible Office
Data, Academic Planning & Institutional ResearchType
University PolicyRationale/Purpose
This policy establishes a university-wide standard for the appointment of instructional staff in courses taught for academic credit at UW–Madison, and as such complies with the Higher Learning Commission’s Criteria for Accreditation.
Policy
- Individuals who teach courses offered for UW-Madison credit must have instructional appointments consistent with that role during the term of instruction.
- The qualifications of instructional staff are evaluated primarily on the basis of earned degrees in a field or subject area relevant to the courses taught, obtained from academic institutions that are accredited by regional higher education associations and/or professional accrediting organizations, or the equivalent quality of university or college in countries outside the U.S.
- All instructional staff must have a terminal degree, or a degree at least one level higher than the degree for which the course is taught, i.e., a master’s degree or greater is required of instructional staff to teach a course that counts toward the bachelor’s degree and a Ph.D. or terminal degree is required for a course that counts towards a master’s or higher level degree. There are cases where the norm in the discipline otherwise includes instructional staff with specialized degrees, e.g., J.D. holders teaching Ph.D. students in law, or an M.F.A. holder teaching Ph.D. students in the arts; or when the accreditation standards of the profession require otherwise.
- Instructional staff teaching in graduate programs must hold a terminal degree determined by the faculty to be appropriate to the discipline and must have a record of research, scholarship, or achievement appropriate for the graduate program.
- In some cases, instructional staff who do not possess the academic credentials described above can be appointed to teach courses if they hold at least a bachelor’s degree and are determined by the hiring authority to be otherwise qualified, e.g., significant contributions in the field, substantial experience. Permission to employ instructors in this category is the purview of the academic unit and is subject to approval of the school or college in which the course(s) is taught.
- Academic units, in consultation with the school/college, must define the minimum threshold of experience for alternative qualification, and establish alternative processes for documenting alternative qualifications, evaluating, and supervising these instructors.
- Other factors that may be considered relevant to being “otherwise qualified” may include, but are not limited to:
- Substantial graduate-level academic coursework and/or methodological training in the discipline.
- Related research experience in the industry and/or the private sector.
- Practical experience in the art, business, legal, or political sector.
- Relevant clinical experience.
- Demonstrated competence or fluency in a language other than English and demonstrated ability to teach that language.
The university expects academic units and the schools/colleges to rarely use this provision. The decision to hire an instructor under this provision must be made with the best interests of the students and the university in mind and must preserve the integrity of the educational experience at UW-Madison.
External References
Approval Authority
Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic AffairsPolicy Manager
Vice Provost for Data, Academic Planning & Institutional ResearchContact
Associate Director, Data, Academic Planning & Institutional Research -- Michelle Young, MEYOUNG@WISC.EDU, (608) 262-2143Effective Date
03-17-2016Source: View policy UW-1010 in the UW-Madison Policy Library
Address the relationship of the course to other UW-Madison courses, including the duplication of content, both inside and outside the primary unit.
Provide information on how this course relates to other courses in or outside of the subject. There can be overlap on subject matter (ex. data science, machine learning, analytics) and it is helpful for governance bodies to understand how a topic may meet specific needs of a subject/program. All courses should have some relationship with other courses within their subject and/or within program curriculum. If a course will be a requisite, or uses other courses in the requisite, provide a short overview of the connection.
Utilize Course Search and Enroll using key words, review of courses in related subject listings, etc. to make sure that the same or very similar course does not already exist. If there is a significantly similar course, justify why there should be more than one.
What subjects (if any) might be interested in this course?
List any/all subjects that have an interest in the course either by overlap, interest to students outside the department, and/or general FYI.
All subjects listed prior to submitting the proposal to workflow will receive a notification of this course proposal. Subjects listed in this field do not have approval authority but may enter a comment with questions or concerns, which the subject(s) must address throughout the workflow process. Proposers will not receive an email notification when comments are added to a proposal.
Subject owners must consult with other areas that offer similar or overlapping courses.