Guidance on Research vs. Quality Improvement and Program Evaluation

Version Date: April 2016


Determining whether a project constitutes human subjects research rather than quality improvement or program evaluation involves multiple factors. The federal definition of research is “a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. Activities which meet this definition constitute research for purposes of this policy, whether or not they are conducted or supported under a program which is considered research for other purposes.” This is an important distinction to make because it determines whether IRB review and oversight of a project is needed because IRB oversight is limited to human subjects research.

The Health Sciences (HS) IRBs Office are frequently asked to make a formal determination that a project falls outside of the federal definition of research. Often, IRB review of these projects isn’t required; however, formal IRB determinations that the projects do not require IRB oversight are requested in anticipation of such documentation being required for journals, conferences, funding sources and others.

The materials below are intended to assist study teams in determining whether a project requires submission to the IRB as a research project involving human subjects. If the project involves some characteristics of a research project, submission to the IRB for review is expected. To address the issue of documentation, the HS IRBs Office also has developed a tool that can provide self-certification that the project does not require IRB review and oversight.

IRB QI/Program Evaluation Self-Certification Tool

This tool allows study teams to make the decision about whether their project constitutes the definition of research under the Common Rule (45 CFR 46) independent of the IRB. The tool is designed to help determine whether the project constitutes research or whether it is quality improvement or program evaluation, such that IRB review isn’t required. If, based on the questions and responses in the completed tool, the project does not constitute research, the tool provides a certification. This certification can be printed off and used as documentation that the project does not constitute research and further IRB review is not required. This certification takes the place of a formal submission in ARROW and subsequent certification notice from the HS IRBs. If completion of the tool indicates the project may require IRB review, any indication of certification from the tool is considered invalid. In this case, the HS IRBs Office should be contacted for further guidance or an initial review application submitted in ARROW.

For assistance answering the questions in the IRB QI/Program Evaluation Self-Certification Tool, please review the following: IRB QI/Program Evaluation Self-Certification Tool Guidance

IRB QI/Program Evaluation Decision Tree

This Decision tree provides an additional resource for assistance in determining whether a project constitutes human subjects research (and subsequently requires IRB review) or quality improvement/program evaluation.The decision tree forms the basis for the questions in the IRB QI/Program Evaluation Self-Certification Tool (see above), but it does not provide a certification upon completion.

Characteristics of Research, Quality Improvement and Program Evaluation Activities

This table is intended to help in determining whether a project requires submission to the IRB as a research project involving human subjects. If the project involves some characteristics of a research project, submission to the IRB for review is expected. Please contact the HS IRBs Office with any questions or for assistance in making a determination.


The above materials are guidance documents for study teams. Additional information about projects that do not constitute human subjects research is available at Guidance on Exemption: Not Human Subjects Research and Engagement in Human Participants Research at UW-Madison. Please note, HIPAA Privacy and Security Rule Regulations may still apply to your project even though IRB review isn't required. If you have questions or concerns about IRB review requirements after reviewing the above materials, please contact the HS IRBs Office for additional assistance.




Keywords:qi, not research, nr, decision tool, decision tree, qa, program evaluation, quality improvement, quality assurance, not research determination   Doc ID:33386
Owner:Faye L.Group:Health Sciences IRBs
Created:2013-09-16 11:34 CSTUpdated:2016-10-05 08:17 CST
Sites:Health Sciences IRBs
Feedback:  4   0