Policy on Creating, Restructuring, or Discontinuing Departments, Programs, and Department-like Units (Archived version. This is the old policy that was in effect Fall 2010 - Fall 2015)
Per Faculty Policies and Procedures 5.02: "Broad guidelines for the substantial restructuring, creation or discontinuance of a department shall be developed by the University Academic Planning Council. Following these guidelines, each school/college shall develop its own criteria for the substantial restructuring of departments..."
“A department shall consist of a group of faculty members recognized by the faculty and chancellor, and the Board of Regents, as dealing with a common field of knowledge or as having common or closely related scholarly interests” -- FP&P 5.01(A).As scholarly interests change over time, circumstances arise that require the faculty to reexamine the existing (or incipient) organization of the departments, programs, or other academic units with which they are affiliated. This introspection may lead to a request to substantially reorganize these entities to better reflect faculty interests. Faculty policy defines “substantial” change that warrants deep consultation: “Substantial restructuring includes, but is not limited to the merger of departments, the transfer of groups of faculty in or out of departments, and the establishment of department-like bodies” FP&P 5.01(A). When such reorganization is desired, FP&P dictates that it may proceed in a formal process that includes a period of study, development of clear recommendations, and approvals granted by the affected departmental/unit executive committees, College and University Academic Planning Councils, Chancellor, and Senate. Throughout the process, the unit is expected to consult extensively both with the Deans’ offices, the APCs, and others who may be affected by the change.
The following L&S policy on the Creation, Restructuring, or Discontinuation of Departments and Programs seeks to ensure that FP&P 5.01 is followed and that affected individuals are afforded an opportunity to engage in these discussions. In preparing recommendations for restructuring, four broad questions need to be addressed concerning the substantial changes to departments, programs, and other “department-like” units:
Centrality: To what extent is the mission and purpose of the unit fulfilling a need that is central to the overall mission of the college and/or university? Are the mission and purpose sufficiently distinct from other units that already exist?
- Quality: What is the quality of the department or program?
- Service: In what ways, and how well, does the department/program meet the needs of undergraduate and graduate students?
- Cost effectiveness: To what extent is the department/program cost effective? If it is not cost effective, does the centrality of its role and quality of its performance (as conveyed in items 1, 2 and 3 above) outweigh the need to be cost effective?
When the request is endorsed by the APC , the next step is to develop a plan to address practical matters related to the desired change. Since different situations will precipitate change and each situation will bring its own set of questions to be answered, there is no template for this plan; however, units are encouraged to consider several categories of issues that should be addressed:
governance and process (decision-making processes that allow all affected parties to participate in discussions about restructuring; adequate communication and consultation with stakeholders; careful attention to relevant campus policy);
- people (personnel, including untenured faculty, classified, and academic staff; students, current and former; other stakeholders, such as boards of visitors);
- resources (financial and physical);
- ongoing responsibilities (e.g., management of or revisions to academic programs, ensuring students’ ability to complete those academic programs; continued administration of grants and contracts); and
- time (stages of implementation and deadlines for accomplishing them).
- Conversations about department/program creation, restructuring or discontinuation will, in most cases, be initiated by the faculty; however, the dean may, after consultation with the Academic Planning Council, request that the faculty initiate these conversations.
- In the event that these conversations lead to a decision that restructuring is warranted, the faculty should inform the Dean and APC via a memorandum seeking to create, restructure, or discontinue the department or program.
- Consistent with FP&P 3.08 B.3 (b), the APC will invite the department chair or program director (or an appropriate member of the faculty in a leadership position) to be present at and participate in a discussion of the request.
- Following this discussion, the planning process should be undertaken in a period of not less than six months. If circumstances suggest that a shorter period is both reasonable and desirable, by mutual agreement of the unit, the deans, and the APC , the “start date” for planning may be adjusted to include some portion of the discussion period preceding the memo.
- Development of the plan will be led by the program faculty. The faculty may designate leaders who will consult extensively with the Associate Dean and the Assistant Dean for Academic Planning as the plan is prepared.
- During the planning phase, faculty representatives, the Associate Dean, and the Assistant Dean for Academic Planning should communicate with other APCs if needed.
- When it is complete, the unit must approve the plan and submit it to the Dean and the APC .
- Per FP&P 3.08 B.3(b), appropriate representatives of the department/program faculty will be present and invited to participate in the APC discussion of the plan.
- If the APC approves the plan, it is presented, with a description of procedures followed, to the UAPC. (If more than one School/College is involved, all APCs should approve the same plan. If necessary, impasses between the APCs and/or deans will be adjudicated by the chancellor before the plan is sent to the UAPC for consideration.)
- The UAPC will either approve the plan or return it for revisions.
- When approved by the UAPC, the plan is presented to the Chancellor and to the Faculty Senate.
Questions about this policy and process should be addressed to the Dean, the Associate Dean, or to the Assistant Dean for Academic Planning.
Print-friendly version of this policy: PolicyonDepartmentalRestructuring-revision10-12.pdf
- Faculty Policies and Procedures, Chapter 5, Departmental Faculties
- FP&P 5.01, Department
- FP&P 5.02, Departmental Restructuring - Guidelines and Criteria