Topics Map > Office of the Secretary of the Faculty > University Committee
University Committee Meeting Minutes 2019-02-11
University Committee Meeting Minutes
Minutes approved 2/18/2019Approved Minutes for February 11, 2019 Approved February 18, 2019
UC members present: Amasino
(chair), Campagnola, Bowers, Ventura, Warfield, Wolf
Others present (as well as those below):
S. Smith, J. Richard, K. Meyerhofer, E. Sandgren, H. Daniels
Chair Rick Amasino
called the meeting to order at 1:02 p.m. Secretary of the Faculty Steve Smith
asked continuing members to save October 17-19, 2019, for the annual BTAA
conference, this time at Michigan. The minutes of the meeting of February 4,
2019, were approved with one typographical note. PROFS lobbyist Jack O’Meara
updated the UC on timing for the governor’s budget and an upcoming meeting with
UWS President Cross. UWS Fac Rep (and UC member) Terry Warfield and O’Meara
also reported on the recent BoR meeting, which featured excellent presentations
on our campus’s activities.
Athletic Board chair Pete
Miller received UC kudos for his Faculty Senate presentation. Miller reported
on the activities of the Board’s four subcommittees: (1) Equity, Diversity, &
Student Welfare, which is focusing on mental health; a new psychologist with an
integrated approach just hired, budget allotment in this area expanded, and
partnership with UHS and others developed; (2) Finance will vote this week on next
year’s budget proposal (after which it goes to the full Board); expenditures
continue to increase here and at our peers; (3) Personnel: all fall sport
coaches have been reviewed and all received very positive marks; and (4) Academics
and Compliance: New academics director just hired, formerly in compliance
department; we do really well in these areas and this continuity can only help.
Miller has started visiting departments to explain the Board and Athletics,
piloting units with the most student athletes. Ample discussion throughout,
including about how to balance various national organizations. One item
discussed heavily that should be brought back at a future meeting is the
longevity of our FAR representatives and the continuity/stability of our
external face. Most of our peers have very long-serving faculty in these roles
and our turnover may be a disadvantage.
Ombuds Chuck Snowden
and Rick Nordheim presented that office’s annual report, which will go to
Senate in March. Demand held steady over the previous year but is at an
all-time high overall. Ample discussion of areas of concern. Provost Sarah
Mangelsdorf discussed possible topics for the upcoming Academic Leadership
Breakfast. The lower-key nature of the spring event presents opportunities. The
UC suggested that this opportunity be taken advantage of to really help chairs
(almost in a “boot camp” kind of way) get the right tools and information,
focusing less on big announcements and initiatives.
Search coordinator
Carole Kolb and recent search chairs Dorothy Edwards and Anja Wanner discussed
governance aspects of search & screen procedures with the UC. While the
immediate impetus for this was changes to the details of when finalists are
announced and how their records are managed, the UC was more focused on making
sure that shared governance and faculty concerns are appropriately and
adequately addressed throughout the search process. The UC agrees with
balancing transparency with other concerns (shortening notice period of
finalist names, restricting access to recordings and other items to just the
campus community, etc.). There is concern about a structure that places both
the hiring authority and the search process in the administration. If the
hiring authority has a support role on the search itself, all present agreed
that the search coordinator should not also be reporting to administration.
There are few, if any, concerns about specific individuals in this regard, but
the structure is problematic. Another level of concern is that “shared
governance” has become in some ways an appendage to the search process rather
than integral to it. All present were also in agreement that the “shared
governance” part of finalist visits needs to be rethought and also that the
check-in with shared governance process described in FPP 6.04.C. and D. must be
respected. There was general agreement on the importance of the chair’s
position and selection and the need for greater consistency across searches of
different types.
Vice Chancellor for
University Relations Charlie Hoslet discussed the messaging strategy around the state budget request.
Outlined in detail in “2019-2021 State Budget Messaging Strategy,” the plan
expands on #UWChangesLives by building monthly stories around specific items in
the budget request, such as health, affordability, rural outreach, workforce
development, and efficiency. UC endorses and commends this approach.
Faculty member and
current provost fellow Mark Rickenbach presented the idea behind his upcoming department
chair survey. Goal is to get a sense of variety across campus in terms of
training opportunities, duties and competencies, support, incentives,
confidence, and other aspects related to department chairs. Ample discussion.
UC is very interested in results and Rickenbach will return once the survey is
done.
Steve Ventura moved
to convene in closed session pursuant to Wis. Stats. 19.85(1)(c) and (f) to
discuss personnel matters. The motion was seconded and passed at 3:27 p.m. The
UC approved a leave of absence extension, noting to the provost that this one
will also require UW president approval as it exceeds 5 years. The UC selected
finalists to interview for the Athletic Board. Paul Campagnola moved to reconvene
in open session. The motion was seconded and passed at 3:58 p.m. Amasino
adjourned the meeting at 3:59 p.m.