Topics Map > Office of the Secretary of the Faculty > University Committee
University Committee Meeting Minutes 2019-08-26
University Committee Meeting Minutes
Minutes approved 09/09/2019Minutes
for August 26, 2019
approved September 9, 2019
UC members present: Campagnola, Halverson, Sandgren,
Ventura, Warfield (chair), Wolf
Others present (in addition to those mentioned below): S. Smith, H. Daniels, B. Tischler, J. Richard, M. Aust, J. Lucas
Chair Terry Warfield called
the meeting to order at 1:01 p.m. Eric Sandgren moved to convene in closed
session pursuant to Wis. Stats. 19.85(1)(c) and (f) to discuss personnel
matters. The motion was seconded and passed at 1:02 p.m. The UC and Vice
Chancellor for Finance and Administration Laurent Heller discussed various
searches and specific applications of search policies. The UC considered and
approved the 2nd year of a faculty leave of absence and nominated a
faculty member for the Memorial Library Committee. Erica Halverson moved to reconvene
in open session. The motion was seconded and passed at 1:40 p.m.
The UC confirmed its
endorsement of the revisions to the new guidelines on departments and
non-departmental academic units, clearing it for confirmation/endorsement by the UAPC. The
UC also supported moving forward with a resolution noting the 125th
anniversary of “sifting and winnowing” at the October Senate meeting, along the
lines of the draft created for the Assembly. The minutes of the meeting of August 19,
2019, were approved.
Extension faculty members
Paul Roback, Ruth Schriefer, and Kirsten Krokowski and Extension Secretary of
the Faculty and Academic Staff Andrea Cool discussed at great length with the
UC the topic of Extension faculty taking on academic staff positions. Issues
under consideration in this context are multiple and include whether positions
should or should not be created as academic staff positions, levels of
responsibility, faculty voice in determining organizational needs and changes
as well as in programming, and much more. The issue of where program/curriculum
development occurs is key and faculty have been excluded from this. APC
presents excellent opportunity to reinsert faculty voice where it belongs. This
discussion concluded due to lack of time, but will be revisited.
College of Engineering Dean
Ian Robertson asked for assistance in addressing teaching effectiveness.
Discussion covered a gamut of both “carrots” and “sticks”; all agreed that more
work is needed. Mentoring and other existing efforts are all well and good, but
what to do about intractable cases is still a problem. Criteria in PTR and
promotion to full are being reviewed and this is an area for potential
solutions. Meanwhile, existing tools (discipline, reassignment, remediation,
etc.) have their limits. Hard to put too much emphasis on solutions at
department level since they have few resources and different incentives. More emphasis
on promotion to criteria and support of division-based “centers” would be
helpful. More explicit guidance on disciplinary and quasi-disciplinary actions
would also be helpful. The UC strongly recommended supporting the Teaching
Academy and helping it to be less marginalized and better funded.
Chancellor Becky Blank
previewed the New Faculty Welcome and picnic, the upcoming Leadership
“breakfast,” convocation, and the first football game. Blank also reported on
developments in the VCRGE search and distributed copies of this year’s Big Read
(Poison Squad). Some discussion ensued. She also reported on summer
term, which has exceeded expectations and goals over last 4 years, and the
working group on visas described by Interim Provost Henderson a few weeks ago.
Some discussion about Athletics and 9-over-12 salary payments.