• To find out whether students have identified the critical points in a lecture, reading, or other types of assignments or
• To help students recall and organize the main points of a lesson within an appropriate knowledge structure — aiding retention and understanding.

• There are no special requirements for this approach.

The following workflow is meant to guide you on how you can facilitate an Empty Outlines learning activity within a classroom.

Pre-Class

• Create an outline of the lecture, presentation, discussion, or reading on which to base the assignment. Decide the level on which you will focus the activity and, thus, the student's attention.
• Decide if students are to supply the main topics, the main subtopics, or the supporting details. These decisions will determine what information you provide and what you leave out.
• Create a template of the outline for students.

In-Class

• Have students work in pairs to complete the activity.
• When students complete the form from memory — without notes or other information — limit the number of items the activity elicits to fewer than ten.
• Let students know how much time they will have to complete the outlines and the desired responses (words, short phrases, or brief sentences).
• Announce the purpose of the assignment and when the students will receive feedback on their responses.

Post-Class

• Review outlines.
• Provide feedback/grades to group participants.

• None

• Creating a Document Template in Google Docs

Example 1

A Child Language Acquisition professor showed a video of an educational television program on the stages of language acquisition from birth to five years.  Before showing it to students, she watched the video and sketched a simple outline of its topics and significant points.  The topics in the outline were the developmental stages of language acquisition; the subheadings were the developmental milestones that characterize each stage.  She deletes the content from the subheadings to create an Empty Outline, leaving the main headings intact.  After the class has viewed the tape, the Empty Outline form is passed out to students.  They were asked to work in pairs to fill out the form.  She allowed five minutes for the work and then collected the completed forms.  A quick analysis of the results showed that students most clearly recall the milestones from the first and last stages presented in the video, while their recollections of the intermediate stages were much sketchier.  This gave the professor clear directions on where to begin the follow-up discussion and what content she needed to focus on.  It also convinced her of the need to stop in the middle of the tape to allow students to take notes and review what they had seen and heard (Angelo 139).

Example 2

After the first major exam in her Pathophysiology course, the professor was concerned that her students had difficulty recognizing, organizing, and recalling the most important parts of her lectures. Toward the end of the following lecture, she handed out copies of an Empty Outline form she created to get a clearer idea of how students were managing the heavy information load of her lectures. The outline contained four main headings, representing the four main topics she had just discussed. Each main heading was followed by empty lines for three to five subheadings. She directed students to fill in the subheadings quickly, using the class notes.  At the end of the activity, she collected the handouts.  A quick reading after class showed her that most students placed their responses under the correct headings. However, many students made the subheadings too specific or mixed items of different levels of specificity. The responses demonstrated that students were missing at least some critical topics because they were distracted by facts. At the next class session, she could illustrate the level on which she wanted students to focus their attention during the lectures (Angelo 139).

Angelo, Thomas A., and K. Patricia Cross. Classroom Assessment Techniques: a Handbook for College Teachers. Jossey-Bass, 1993. pp. 138-141.