Topics Map > Slate (Grad Admissions)

Setting up the Review Workflow for your program

Learn about the a few options in setting up your Reader Review Workflow so your program can effectively use Slate to review applications to your program(s).

The Review Workflow in Slate: Flexibility Means Making Choices

In general, all applications to the UW-Madison Graduate School go through the same three basic steps:

  1. A prospective student fills out an application and submits it to a program.
  2. The program reviews the application, and either recommends the applicant to the Graduate School for admission or denies the applicant.
  3. Recommended applications are reviewed by the Graduate School and processed.

And that is about where the similarities end.

When designing the Reader and the Review Workflow for Graduate School Admissions, the Slate Project Team team knew that building a "one size fits all" system is a difficult (if not impossible) task. So, instead, we did our best to design a system that would provide enough flexibility so that the 300 programs in the UW-Madison Graduate School could effectively choose how to use Slate's Review Workflow to organize their applications. This flexibility means that Graduate Program Coordinators and their programs will need think about how they want to set up their Review Workflow.

Conceptualizing Your Program's Review Workflow in Slate: A Few Models

It can be hard to think about how your program might want to use the bins available in the Review Workflow to fit your specific review process, especially when Slate is new to you. To help you and your program with making these decisions, we've provided three example Review Workflow models for you to consider.

To review how these might work you can:

 



Keywords:
Slate reader application admissions setup 
Doc ID:
131602
Owned by:
Eric L. in Graduate School
Created:
2023-09-21
Updated:
2024-12-02
Sites:
Graduate School