Long-term Enrollment Planning

Long-term enrollment planning is essential for maintaining program strength and resilience amid evolving challenges in graduate education.

Begin with data

Examine trends in both domestic and international student yield and enrollment, evaluate access and inclusion metrics, and assess progress-to-degree for current students. These insights will inform resource allocation and highlight areas where additional support may be needed.

Define your program's goals

When setting future enrollment goals, admissions committees should take into account faculty research priorities, mentorship capacity, and available resources. Admitting more students than faculty can effectively mentor compromises program quality and student experience. Likewise, internal and external funding availability should guide planning, as financial constraints directly affect cohort size and student success.

Key considerations include:

Faculty research priorities and mentorship capacity
Internal and external funding availability
Infrastructure and student support resources

Review holistically

Programs are encouraged to adopt a holistic approach to admissions–evaluating applicants through a combination of quantitative and qualitative measures–to develop a comprehensive understanding of their strengths and potential for success in graduate study. This approach ensures that no single metric–such as GRE scores or GPA cutoffs–determines an admissions decision. Overreliance on numerical indicators alone often fails to predict graduate-level success. Instead, a holistic review supports a more equitable and accurate assessment by considering the full context of each applicant’s experiences, accomplishments, and aspirations.

Seek balance and context

Applications from international students may require additional considerations, such as credential evaluation, cultural context, and financial planning. Programs should interpret standardized test scores and GPAs within context, using them as part of a broader assessment of readiness rather than rigid thresholds. When possible, interviews can provide valuable insights into applicants’ goals, resilience, and communication skills, complementing written applications.

Be proactive

Finally, programs should document all admissions processes, maintain clear records of evaluation criteria, and review practices annually to identify areas for refinement. By taking a proactive, data-informed, and holistic approach, graduate programs can build strong, sustainable cohorts that advance their mission and thrive in an increasingly competitive academic landscape.